House Democrats Pass $1.9 Trillion COVID-19 Relief Bill

WASHINGTON ― After hours of delays, the House passed a $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief bill early Saturday morning, taking the first step toward delivering another round of stimulus checks, enhanced unemployment benefits, increased child tax credits and an influx of cash for state and local governments. 

The House passed the bill almost entirely along partisan lines, 219-212, with two Democrats, Kurt Schrader of Oregon and Jared Golden of Maine, voting no. 

The measure will now go to the Senate, where it’s set to pass by a “reconciliation” process that requires a simple majority. But not before one key provision is stripped. 

The Senate parliamentarian ruled Thursday that a section providing for a $15-an-hour minimum wage could not be done through the reconciliation process, deciding that it did not have enough of an impact on the federal budget to qualify. It left that provision subject to a 60-vote threshold. 

Democrats have only 50 seats in the Senate ― with Vice President Kamala Harris able to break a tie in favor of the Democrats ― and the $15 minimum wage was already imperiled because of opposition from Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.). But even though the Senate parliamentarian had ruled that the minimum wage provisions couldn’t be done through reconciliation, House Democrats still included it. 

That means the bill will still have to come back to the House for a final vote after the Senate amends the legislation. However, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) kept the minimum wage hike in after progressives argued they had already compromised on other items they wanted in the COVID-19 relief bill. 

Ultimately, the $1.9 trillion package has a number of provisions that progressives love. It would provide a round of $1,400 checks to most Americans. It extends and increases a federal boost to unemployment benefits by $400 a week ― up from $300 ― and provides that extra money until September. It increases the child tax credit to $3,000 for children ages 6 to 17 and raises it to $3,600 for children younger than 6. It also provides $1,400 checks per dependent. 

On top of all those policies, there’s money for state and local governments ($350 billion), public schools ($128 billion), higher education ($39 billion), coronavirus testing and contact tracing ($46 billion), rental assistance ($25 billion), restaurants and bars ($25 billion), child care ($15 billion), vaccine distribution ($14 billion), pandemic supplies ($10 billion) and a host of other public health causes. 

It was that wish list which drew the ire of Republicans. They castigated the legislation as wasteful and argued it was a giveaway to special interests. 

“The swamp is back,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Friday. 

“Almost every one of this bill’s 592 pages includes a liberal pipe dream that predates the pandemic,” McCarthy added. 

The ranking Republican on the House Budget Committee, Jason Smith (R-Mo.), argued that only a small portion of the bill went toward vaccines and combating the coronavirus. “This is the wrong plan at the wrong time for all the wrong reasons,” he said. 

Smith and other Republicans argued that the bill was unnecessary because a large portion of the money allocated in previous COVID-19 relief measures still hadn’t been spent. 

But that ignores many of the financial challenges that are pressing. And Democrats countered that they had to go big on this bill to meet the current economic challenges. 

“Relief cannot wait, and we’re not going to wait,” House Budget Chair John Yarmuth (D-Ky.) said late Friday night. 

Pelosi noted that this week the U.S. surpassed 500,000 coronavirus deaths. 

“These statistics are not just numbers,” Pelosi said. “They are the lives and livelihoods of our neighbors, family members, friends and loved ones. We are moved to act swiftly to put an end to this pandemic and to stem the suffering felt by so many.” 

Pelosi also argued that if Congress didn’t pass this package, “the results could be catastrophic.” 

She said not passing the bill would cost the economy 4 million jobs, delay a return to full employment by a year and push back a return to pre-pandemic levels of the GDP by four years. 

“As President Biden has said, ‘Help is on the way,’” Pelosi said. 

After passing five other COVID-19 relief bills under President Donald Trump on a bipartisan basis, Democrats went ahead with the partisan reconciliation process for their sixth bill. Republicans have previously stifled spending on a number of priorities, particularly state and local governments, and Democrats felt they needed a large enough economic response to bolster the economy and get Americans through the final months of the coronavirus pandemic as more people get vaccinated. That meant not trying to appease GOP demands and instead satiating their own caucus. 

Though the removal of a $15 minimum wage will be a blow to progressives, the overall legislation should provide enough aid to keep them on board throughout the process ― even after the wage hike is stripped in the Senate. 

However, progressives are exploring a number of options to keep the minimum wage increase in the bill. Senate Budget Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) are exploring a system that would revoke certain tax benefits to corporations if they don’t meet those wage requirements, and House progressives are exploring ways to pressure their Senate colleagues to overrule the parliamentarian. 

But without Manchin’s consent, it might be impossible to substantially increase the minimum wage. Other Democratic senators, including Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), have said they won’t get rid of the filibuster or undermine it by working around the parliamentarian’s rulings on reconciliation. And Congress is already pressed for time on this COVID-19 relief package. A number of provisions, such as the increased unemployment benefits, are due to run out in two weeks. 

President Joe Biden has made it clear he wants the bill passed soon to avert any lapse in benefits, and he has adamantly defended the cost of the legislation. 

“Critics say the plan is too big,” Biden said earlier this week. “Let me ask them a rhetorical question: What would you have me cut?”