Stablecoin strife: crypto assets face calls for tougher oversight

Posted By : Telegraf
7 Min Read

[ad_1]

The stablecoin market, a crucial link between crypto and traditional currencies, is facing calls for tougher oversight, with regulations on both sides of the Atlantic lagging behind the rapid growth in digital assets.

Stablecoins claim to represent a safe harbour for traders to stash funds, making them a central part of cryptocurrency trading in a similar way money market funds are used by typical investors.

A patchwork of disclosure standards, the overall lack of consumer protections and stablecoins’ potential role as a less traceable form of money have sharpened calls for tougher oversight as the market has rapidly expanded along with broader digital asset industry.

“Certainly the direction of travel is to look at regulating them,” said John Salmon, who leads law firm Hogan Lovells’ blockchain and cryptocurrency practice.

Policymakers in the US, UK and continental Europe are all weighing up potential plans for closer oversight of stablecoins, which are “pegged” to traditional currencies, commodities or other digital assets in order to reduce volatility. Most stablecoin issuers say their coins are fully backed with reserves, usually traditional currencies or cryptocurrencies.

A group of US members of Congress late last year proposed legislation that would require stablecoin issuers to obtain a banking charter, follow banking regulations and receive approval from the Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

“Digital currencies, whose value is permanently pegged to or stabilised against a conventional currency like the dollar, pose new regulatory challenges while [they] also represent a growing source of the market, liquidity, and credit risk,” the group, which included Rashida Tlaib and Stephen Lynch of the House of Representatives, said.

Read More:  FTWeekend Digital Festival: ESG — a way to help to save the planet or mere guff?

What is a stablecoin?

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies that are pegged to another asset, theoretically reducing their volatility. This stability makes them useful for converting between fiat currencies and other cryptocurrencies.

Stablecoins can be linked to asset classes such as physical currencies, baskets of currencies, other cryptocurrencies and even real estate.

Tether, launched in 2014, is the largest stablecoin by circulation, with about $56bn coins. Facebook-backed stablecoin, Diem (previously known as Libra) could launch this year.

Rohan Grey, a law professor at Willamette University who helped draft the bill, added that “there is this long history of new entrants into the financial sector using a technological edge . . . to offer a variation on bank money and to avoid regulation in the short term as a bank so that they can establish market share”.

“All of [the variations of stablecoins] to me are just shadow banking which should have been regulated . . . as part of the banking system,” he said.

Harry Eddis, partner at law practice Linklaters, pointed to the European Commission’s Markets in Crypto-Assets proposal and the UK Treasury’s consultation into stablecoins, both of which call for greater regulation in the sector and which note the ambiguity surrounding the status of stablecoins.

“If a stablecoin falls into the unregulated or e-money category, a lot of regulatory oversight and conduct rules fall away,” said Eddis. “That’s why you’re seeing a lot of regulators wanting to assert regulation.”

Last June, the Financial Action Taskforce, which sets global standards on money-laundering and terrorist financing, released its draft report to the G20 group of nations on stablecoins. It noted that mechanisms for stabilising the assets could present avenues for market manipulation.

Read More:  Five fun family cars starting under $40,000

The regulatory debate comes as many investors in the crypto market are scrutinising Tether, the biggest stablecoin with about $56bn in circulation, according to CoinMarketCap.com.

The stablecoin — which is “pegged” at $1 — is in focus partly because it has continued operating in many jurisdictions and grown rapidly even after a censure by New York’s attorney-general.

The state AG said in February that Tether’s “claims that its virtual currency was fully backed by US dollars at all times was a lie”. Tether and affiliate Bitfinex were also ordered to provide quarterly reports, providing details on what kinds of assets are being used to back Tether coins. The groups said they “admit no wrongdoing” in the matter.

Line chart: Value in circulation $bn showing Tether has grown rapidly with the cryptocurrency market

Tether now says its coins are “fully” backed by the company’s reserves, but it has provided scant details about the mix of assets it holds besides saying that it can include everything from “traditional currency” to “receivables from loans made by tether to third parties”.

“The fact that they still have not [released] this [information] so late into the game but have $50bn coins issued is preposterous,” said Tim Swanson, founder of technology advisory firm Post Oak Labs.

Tether and several other big stablecoin issuers such as USD Coin backer Circle publish so-called “attestations” by third-party accountants to provide some level of disclosure into their holdings. However, these statements can differ from traditional audits in terms of what they disclose, with considerable variety between companies.

“As the most trusted dollar digital currency in circulation, Circle remains committed to high standards of transparency and accountability for USD Coin,” said a spokesperson.

Read More:  Vaccitech/AstraZeneca: souring mood overshadows float plan

Amy Kim, chief policy officer at industry group the Chamber of Digital Commerce, said if companies took a “more unified approach” it would “build consumer confidence and help the industry grow more responsibly”. Last week, the group released a report suggesting a cohesive standard, to counter the “uneven and inconsistent methods”.

Stablecoins also face a longer-term challenge from central bank digital currencies, which would offer a digital payment system separate to commercial banks and payment companies.

Different proposals include allowing individuals to maintain digital accounts at a central bank or a digital token.

“This is going to be the big geopolitical discussion over the next decade,” said Jonathan Knegtel, co-founder and chief executive of blockchain analysis company Blockdata. “Are the regulators going to be comfortable with stablecoins coexisting with central bank digital currencies?”

[ad_2]

Source link

Share This Article
Leave a comment